The problem with SEO is that a little knowledge is dangerous, and a little knowledge spreads quickly and turns into rumour and misconstrued statements. Suddenly everyone is parroting the same things and following the same (wrong!) advice. I’ve listed three of the biggest SEO myths I regularly see cropping up so you can avoid making the same mistake.

1. Relevance is the most important factor for a link.

Of course it’s great to have relevant links to your website as it looks more natural, but the reality is that links from quality unrelated websites with good SEOmoz scores and PageRank have much more influence than relevant ones from those with lower scores. It’s better to have a few high-value links in an unrelated industry than hundreds of poor-quality ones that are related.

It’s not just about what is said but who’s saying it. Would a teacher would prefer to have an award from the government instead of an award from their headmaster? Almost definitely. It carries more weight, even if the government is in a less able position to judge. Would you turn down a link from the BBC even though news/media might not be a directly relevant topic for your website? Of course you wouldn’t.

Of course, in an ideal world you want links that are both relevant and high-quality…but if it comes to choosing between the two, unless you know for a fact it’s an up-and-coming site and destined for great things, always choose the higher-quality link.

2. You should link to the same URL with different anchor text on the same page.

This happens surprisingly often, and if abused on a site without much authority can trigger instant penalisation. Rankings for keywords can disappear overnight, although the site may still rank for its own name.

People do this for all kinds of reasons – because they think it will help vary their anchor text, because they think it’s an easy way to improve internal linking, etc. It’s not. Inevitably you will naturally repeat the same URL on the same page and have different anchor text. That’s fine. Keyword stuffing in the same links over and over to try and improve your search rankings is not fine. Especially to your index page, which is where most people do it.

Guess what? Google only counts the first instance of anchor text on a page for any given URL. So everything after the first link to a page (as an example, it’s probably the ALT/title text of your logo or banner for your homepage) is irrelevant. Linking to your homepage multiple times with different keyword anchor text in your footer is going to do you a lot more harm than good, put it that way!

3. Content is king

This is probably the most controversial one, so let me explain what I mean here. Content is wonderful. It’s fantastic. We’d have no use for the internet without it. But it’s not the be-all and end-all. ‘Content is king’ sits alongside ‘If you build it, they will come’.

Great content is essential, but it will only get you so far unless you’re incredibly lucky and everything you create goes viral (hint: that’s not likely to happen).

When you’re dealing with very competitive niches, content is not something that will get you very far, especially if you’re competing with the big boys on the first page. Of course you need great content, but it doesn’t mean you’re going to rank on page one. Awesome links and small tweaks (for example page speed), will help you rise up the first page. Yes, content will help you attract links – to some degree, depending how popular the site is and how proactively you chase links – and you need it before the link building part, but it’s not sitting up there on a pedestal all of its own. There are plenty of other things to consider, especially if you’re chasing competitive first page rankings.



6 Responses to 3 of the most controversial SEO myths

  1. Thanks for the tips, I agree with you! Also by letting me comment with anchor text is a huge help for my SEO campaign. There are so many web design elements that need to be considered. Not only does it have to look great but it has to function well, such as ease of use, speed and by all means SEO search engine optimization is key. Just because you can design a great looking website doesn’t mean it is a great website. In the Myrtle Beach Area, web designing is very competitive and the clients are depending on being found and very important, keeping the visitor on their website.


  2. I personally think you’re wrong about the most controversial point. Point 2 is self harming and most SEO’s and webmasters would understand it. Anyone who’s spend enough time building websites will understand that great content alone wont get you far. But the relevance is still highly debated. It’s debated among SEO’s and even clients look for relevance when building links. So for me that’s the most controversial one and one I find most hard to convince others.


  3. These are valuable myths which are very popular in almost all SEO individuals as well as companies. I heard from hundreds of peoples that content is king. Yes it is , but its not like that we are beggar if we don’t have great content. SEO depends on various things. And its a combination of different things which helps to rank website in search engine.

    Thanks
    Mohammed Imran


  4. Narender Chopra@Haryana Police Recruitment says:

    Totally Agreed with your points bro. Inspite of these a lot of SEO Myths are their that peoples are still taking seriously. The best practice is concentrating on a content,ON Page SEO and some relevant links to Article Pages.


  5. Really nice and interesting post about SEO myths.

    Relevance , quality and uniqueness of content are the top 3 most important factors when we do SEO.

    Now a days I believe the content is really important since the new algorithms are applied to the search engines.


  6. I would say “Content is the king: is not a SEO myth because it is really true. It is one of the major factors of increasing your websites ranking and establishing stronger brand awareness. It is what the target audience want to know about so you must address their need.


Comments are currently closed.